<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The cost of care.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468</link>
	<description>FixKP: the unofficial Kaiser Permanente blog at blog.fixkp.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468/comment-page-1#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>Why hasn&#039;t there been any update on what&#039;s happening with HealthConnect???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why hasn&#8217;t there been any update on what&#8217;s happening with HealthConnect???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468/comment-page-1#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468#comment-4677</guid>
		<description>&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.medsphere.com/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Medsphere&lt;/a&gt; is trying that. But think about the cost of operating VistA each year. It&#039;s much less than KP&#039;s Epic-branded HealthConnect. Less room for profit? Maybe you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a HREF="http://www.medsphere.com/" REL="nofollow">Medsphere</a> is trying that. But think about the cost of operating VistA each year. It&#8217;s much less than KP&#8217;s Epic-branded HealthConnect. Less room for profit? Maybe you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaiserfraud</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468/comment-page-1#comment-4676</link>
		<dc:creator>kaiserfraud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468#comment-4676</guid>
		<description>But then would Kaiser be able to stamp their own brand on the VA system and resell it to any other health care system in the market for a large scale EMR? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But then would Kaiser be able to stamp their own brand on the VA system and resell it to any other health care system in the market for a large scale EMR? <img src='http://blog.fixkp.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468/comment-page-1#comment-4675</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixkp.org/2006/12/11/the-cost-of-care/468#comment-4675</guid>
		<description>did kaiser ever at vista for their emr system? i think the va will give the software to whoever wants to use it. free sure beats the billions they&#039;ve spent on the &quot;cheaper&quot; system they&#039;re trying to make work right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did kaiser ever at vista for their emr system? i think the va will give the software to whoever wants to use it. free sure beats the billions they&#8217;ve spent on the &#8220;cheaper&#8221; system they&#8217;re trying to make work right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
